Between Technology and Criminal Justice

I. Introduction As discipline plays a vital role in the advancements of venomous justice body, technological changes atomic number 18 closely related to the best leave of criminal justice. The very efficiency of system can be integral to the flavor of justice it provides. more(prenominal)over, the timely dissemination of study through spic-and-span technologies too has bigger impacts on criminal justice system. At present, technological development has become more than complex and it has given birth to new types of databases which atomic number 18 qualitatively different.The purpose of this study is to analyze the effects of technological advancements pertaining to the converse capabilities of criminal justice system. It would the merits and demerits of major databases much(prenominal)(prenominal) as AFIS, outlast peter out, Facial Recognition, and masthead record briefly and comp atomic number 18s them in their strengths and weaknesses. II. Technology, Database a nd unlawful Justice Over the years, tuition engine room has become a key parting of the criminal justice systems as it has unprecedentedly enhanced the talk capabilities of database available for the charter of criminal justice.Not only the inquiry bodies such as police but in addition courts and presidential terms as decision making agencies too make use of advances information and communication technologies in their pursuit of criminal justice. blitz (2004) has argued that the creation of databases for undefiled population itself is illicit and categorically asserts that it is non merely the proceed observation of activities that undercuts privacy, but to an pull down great degree, the ongoing recording of these activities.Importantly, criminals too go been using sophisticated technology not only for cyber crimes but similarly for inflicting concentrated crimes over several realms of social life. technologically sophisticated databases such as GPS bring in brace lets, biometric scanners, online offender indexes, and DNA databasesgive the government power to visualize dangerous persons without relying on any exertion of physical surmount ( spud, 2008). Automated Finger affects Identification Systems (AFIS) enables the checking of criminal biography records of a person just a matter of minutes.It has been argues that the ability of AFIS systems to search millions of records in minutes and present candi employments to the latent scratch examiner borders on the incredible (Komarinski, 2005). AFIS is technologically sophisticated mainly in terzetto counts quantity wise-the extent of fingerprints could be mishandle checked, quality wise- the extent of correctness of the information and time wise-the extent of time legal transfer and separate related benefits bringd. AFIS can be helpful not only in identifying criminals but too the victims of crime.Following the World foxiness Center attack, it is with the help of AFIS, the latent prin t examiners were able to identify over ccc victims, bringing closure and comfort to their families. This would not boast been possible without AFIS technology (Komarinski, 2005). It is also helpful for identifying slew with memory disorders or who are dead. Moreover, it could be as exquisite as possible to integrate the entire biometric details of all the people in the world.Also, it is possible to link AFIS systems easily with early(a) databases too. AFIS can also be utilise in avoiding welfare cheating and the pay off allocation of government services for the good people. As AFIS systems grow in striking speed, a latent print lay out at crime site could be compared against all the known people and if not matching, could be stored for future match. signal flag Scan is highly advanced as which are per perceived to have a high accuracy rate than traditional facial recognition programs.Also, masthead scan enables the sustenance of ones identity without even his/her identi ty as it is legal in most countries to scoot the image of a person in public. It also could be potentially use for imposing residency and movement restrictions that herald certain areas off limits to particular individuals who have conditional paroles, barring notices or persevere away orders. However, it gives the possibility of the misuse of Iris Scan databases for segregating ethnic minorities or other dissident groups.A technology like Live Scan or Iris Scan can be an easy shot for governments and big corporations to breach the privacy of unprejudiced individuals and despotic regimes could considerably use them for inspection of the entire population. Also, such databases and techniques could be hacked by criminal elements and used for terrorizing the whole world. Murphy (2005) has pointed out that government strategies virtual contol could be more dangerous than physical control as still the courts unduly focalise on the physical world as the relevant metric against wh ich all restraints are judged.As a result, technologies of restraint are oblige without necessary procedural safeguards. The unaccountability of the possible uses of databases by the governments too is a matter of terrific concern. In other words, a technological development such as Iris Scan enables the government and security agencies to varan the entire population amounting to imprison people in a prison without walls. In comparison, it could be argued that Iris Scan could be considered as the best available database could be used fro criminal justice.It does not involve any physical touch for the obtaining of date and it could be taken without the consent of a person. Moreover, Iris Scan could be vigorous used to obtain the sample even from an unwilling person without using force. III. windup The technological advancements have helped the conduct of criminal justice faster, accurate and less procedurally complex. More than punitive measures, database could be used also for affirmative actions such as victim identification, welfare distribution, cheat prevention etc.However, it opens up new possibilities for abuse as well such as those by authoritarian regimes and commercial interests in monitoring the population. root Blitz, M. J. (2004). Video Surveillance and the Constitution of man Space Fitting the Fourth Amendment to a World That Tracks Image and Identity. Texas Law Review. 82 (6). pp. 1349-85 Komarinski, P. (2005) Automated Fingerprint Identification Systems (AFIS). Burlington. Elsevier faculty member Press. Murphy, E. (2008). Paradigms of Restraint. Duke Law Journal. 57 (5). pp. 1321-45